Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:49
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Has anyone ever participated in a gang bang and what was it like?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
OpenAI claims to have hit $10B in annual revenue - TechCrunch
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why did the UK Supreme Court rule that transgender women are not women?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
New Jersey Man Arrested for Stealing Instruments From Heart - Rolling Stone
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
A 14-year-old created an app that detects heart disease almost instantly - Boy Genius Report
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
DC Mayor Bowser’s message for Shakira after WorldPride cancellation: ‘Get yourself here’ - WTOP